I think photo editing can be both a
good thing and a bad thing. There are times when it can be beneficial and other
times it can be deceiving and/or hurtful. Photo editing is appropriate when it
comes to touching up photos for a good reason like acne or a visible scar. I don’t
find photo editing appropriate when others find it funny to crop people into
ugly situations or mean photos. It’s also not appropriate and untruthful when magazines
photo edit actresses and actors to look even better than they already do. Sometimes,
they are editing, painted, and tightened so much They edit photos to make these
people look absolutely flawless which does effect society in a negative way by
giving us an unrealistic idea of what a man or woman is supposed to look like. Photo
editing has improved so much to where we do actually believe what we see because
the people all over the magazine covers have been altered and cropped their
whole life by computers which sends the message of “perfection” to the rest of
the world. Even when you have family portraits made by professional
photographers they give you the option to do touch ups to your photos to give
them a more enhanced look so they say. When we had pictures made for our church
directory, they air brushed our faces so much you would think we had Botox
injected into every line and wrinkle on our faces possible.
I chose this photo from http://static2.stuff.co.nz/1256856973/337/3015337.jpg
because it clearly shows on the right what photo editing in photo shop can do
to a photo of a person. They have basically performed plastic surgery over a
computer. They gave this woman a completely different look and made her look 10
to 20 years younger and they even gave her a little bit of a haircut. If they
were to publish this photo publically, then it would be a bold faced lie. The
woman on the right is not even the same woman as the one on the left anymore. I
chose this photo because it is a perfect example of just how untruthful photo
shopping can be to the human eye. If we were to just see the photo on the left
we would think that is how she originally looks, which is then once again not
true. It goes along with blog perfectly because I claimed earlier in my post
that photo editing can be deceiving and untruthful when magazines alter a
person’s look just to make them look as if they are flawless and perfect.
It is hard to know when to draw the line on photo editing. How much is too much? We all expect it and accept it as something that is done when it comes to advertising and fashion magazines. What about photo editing in news? You didn't mention that, but it is something to think about.
ReplyDelete